User talk:A Real Journalist

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jack Scalia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jack Scalia was changed by A Real Journalist (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864707 on 2015-03-11T20:50:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I have again reverted your edits on Jack Scalia. Unfortunately what you are doing has removed references and their inline citations, and replaced them with numbers which do not link to any references, as well as paragraphs of information without references. Please have a read of WP:CS on how to cite sources, and WP:RS on what counts as a reliable source. There is no problem updating information, but making such large changes without including references and at the same time removing sources and correctly formatted referenced tags will continue to see editors like me revert your changes. Perhaps start a bit smaller and make changes a little bit at a time, making sure you have correctly formatted references as you go, as this will help others editors work with you (see WP:CON) to improve the article. Alternatively, you could discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page, and even ask for help there as to how to make the changes in a well-sourced way. Thanks, Melcous (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

A Real Journalist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi A Real Journalist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Promotional editing and sourcing

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ketamine. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Ketamine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 00:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Are you in any way employed or compensated for your editing?

The Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require that all editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation":

If this applies to you, please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jack Scalia, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)