User talk:A Nobody Has Returned From The Sea

Thank for your message; your unusual editing

Hi ANHRFTC,
Thank you for your message. You wrote:

Do not misrepresent policy. Policy states that you are "encouraged" to justify PROD removal. Not that you absolutely have to justify PROD removal under pain of death.

You were right, and I was wrong: WP:CONTESTED requires no user input at all.
I am concerned about about your unusual editing. Your account was registered today 5 May 2011, but you appear to have the understanding of Wikipedia policy that would suggest that you may have edited -- perhaps with different usernames -- before. Please be aware that Wikipedia has policies about using multiple accounts. All that said, I do appreciate your constructive feedback.
Thanks again - --Shirt58 (talk) 12:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you made a good point there, WP:SOCK. How about you come back and make constructive edits? Would always be on your side, provided you strictly adhere to the Wikipedia:Rules, if you so do. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still picking on A Nobody?

Listen Jack, we all know how you love sock puppets, but this is rather lame. A Nobody has left Wikipedia for awhile now. Don't you have a new victim to torment? Dream Focus 08:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You referring to me, Dream Focus? Dream on — go ahead and request a CU or SPI. And read WP:AGF. Jeers, Jack Merridew 08:42, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you'd have this page on your watchlist? Dream Focus 08:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I noticed the ANI post and watched it; I watch a lot of things ;) Jack Merridew 08:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not very convincing, even without your long history of constant harassment, then playing innocent for whatever sick pleasure you get from tormenting others. Anyway, I filed a report. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack Merridew Hopefully someone will look into this more thoroughly and catch you using socks again. You do seem to enjoy seeing what you can get away with. Dream Focus 08:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terima kasih ;) Jack Merridew 08:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Focus, it was CheckUser confirmed (by MuZemike), to be a sockpuppet of User:Editor XXV, NOT Jack Merridew. And as someone who has dealt with Editor XXV, I can tell you this is not him (Jack) either. --Bsa dow ski1 09:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe he is probably this other user as well. Discussing that at: User talk:Spitfire#Jack Merridew case Dream Focus 09:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]