User talk:A Fungus Amungus

June 2020

Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Suicide Silence (album)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 18:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Generally, a persons response should not have a section that long. You might consider doing something much shorter. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 18:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could help me out with that? 😘 A Fungus Amungus (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chester Bennington. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. andritolion (talk) 17:26, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Sully Erna, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am striking the above message because I think this user should have one more chance to edit in line with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. However, the fact that two other editors have reverted the user's edits for the same policy reason adds to my opinion that the user needs to review the various pages cited. Donner60 (talk) 02:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing wrong with how I was editing. The Sully Erna article reads like it was written by a 10 year old. A Fungus Amungus (talk) 03:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:A Fungus Amungus

User:A Fungus Amungus, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:A Fungus Amungus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:A Fungus Amungus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 03:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices from pages, or remove other people's comments in Miscellany for deletion debates, as you did with User:A Fungus Amungus. If you do, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of a page, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 04:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Nickelback. Qzd (talk) 18:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.