User talk:AVA rulez

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ray Quinn, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 14:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ray Quinn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 14:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTF

y r u reverting my edits.

Also u call urself an advanced mathematician but sum to infinity of 1/i^2 is C2 (AS maths) AVA rulez 14:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're vandalism, basically. Why are you reverting AnemoneProjectors?

Oh, and it sums to pi^2/6. Gscshoyru 14:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Warns

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The X Factor (UK series 2), you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 14:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AVA rulez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked as a sockpuppet but the only 'evidence' is that i talked about maths, so theer is no evidence i am a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

Your editing is disruptive, and you surely look like a sockpuppet to me. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AVA rulez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, this is unfair. There is no evidence of me being a sockpuppet - where is it ? I may be disruptive IYO but that doesnt make me a sockpuuppet so remove the tag otherwise i will have to report this

Decline reason:

Minutes after I block several sockpuppets, including User:I know about partial derivatives, you create this account, revert all my recent edits, and talk about partial derivatives on someone's user talk page. Seems pretty conclusive to me. — anemone projectors 14:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.