User talk:ASHOKBINDUSARA

Welcome!

Hello, ASHOKBINDUSARA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dina Wadia

Please note that all information, especially potentially negative or contentious information, about living people must be verified by a reliable source. If you wish to re-add that info to Dina Wadia, you must provide sources for it. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add unsourced, negative comments about living people, you will be blocked, as that is expressly forbidden by WP:BLP. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and then you should ask users specially muslims from not postinf fake indo about feroze jehangir gandhi otherwise everybody knows that dina jinnah married ram kumar walia and not wadia

I don't personally watch all 3 million articles on Wikipedia. In any event, if "everyone knows" it, there must be a reliable source. My suggestion is to discuss it on the article's talk page. Note that adding in the wrong wife, while a mistake, probably wouldn't violate WP:BLP. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bigoted remarks

Don't. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

When you have a chance, please read Wikipedia:Citing sources; this will explain to you about how to format references in Wikipedia articles rather than adding bare URLs. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Hitler religious views

go and get some knowledge about the authors who have published the books you dumb christian , oh maybe you are jealous that Hitler was inspired by Hindusim now you will someday say that hp blavatsky too dont have any expertise in the field of aryans the historian who told about aryans first simply means that the latest use of aryan is refers only to INDO-ARYAN people and not to indo-european or indo-iranian.

the section just below this on islam contains things which are not given in any book simply a link has been posted and do you want to say that Heinrich himmler didnt have affection for hindu religious writing then you are simply a anti-hindu and weak person and i will ban you next time if you try to vandalize the article , can you give your thoughts on islam section it says something which is not given in any book by any author. Otherwise you are just another dumb christian who dont know to which religion Jesus christ belongs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk • contribs) 14:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Haploidavey (talk) 14:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

all the authors mentioned in the source are of good credibility and not like those which are referred on the same article of hitler religious views.Otherwise plz proove that Mr Heinrich himmler was not close to hinduism by pointing out some sources and not talking in air otherwise you will be nothing more than a crying baby, every article and source mentions that he was very close to hinduism and use to carry Bhagvad gita of hinduism with himself , his comment on bible inferiority in front of hindu texts will surely make you scratch your head he was not a roman catholic but a hindu .ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk) 14:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. Enough with the personal attacks. Commment on content, not editors - that's policy. If you need to confirm this (and I rather think you do if you want to keep editing here) read the welcome messages on your talk page, and follow its links. If you're adding content to articles, the onus is on you (not others) to support your material with reliable sources. Haploidavey (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC) (I've copied this exchange from my talk-page).[reply]

Your recent edits

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

then have a uniform code of conduct for all editors and not pick out odd ones, here different editors agree to those citations which suit them and if the citation dont suit them then the author is not credible enough even the likes of Helena blavastky sources have been deleted the legendary historian dont need the agreement of local editors like you or me , so have uniform law of conduct and about fake info their are million of fake info like so called descant of Mughals from genghis khan has been proved fake long time back,further the articles on Kublai khan the grandson of Genghis khan dont mention that he converted to Buddhism with the help of Tibetan Lama and as a result he converted most of eastern asia into buddhism maybe the fact that Buddhism god is none other than Hindu Lord Gautam Buddha and that shows the mentality why the hell everyone wants to hide the truth.ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible that if the head of SS Heinrich Himmler followed Hinduism so closely that its world known fact that he was deeply fascinated by Hindu religious texts and infact he used the texts in parts in order to justify the guilt which he committed. He in his public speech gave the same message to his soldiers which Lord Krishna in Mahabhrata gave to Arjun.He compared Hitler with none other than Lord Krishna and what about the french nazi women who converted to Hinduism , in her book she claimed that Hitler considered himself 10th avatar(reincarnation) of lord vishnu.The only point which i see that hinduism and its master distance itself from NAZISM is that it may lead to hate attacks against hindus. The theory that one person destiny is decided by his blood/race is mentioned in Hinduism texts almost 4000 years ago which mentions that Superior people are meant to rule over Inferior people and from their comes the Caste system in hinduism which is now been criticized by world people.But its a fact only people with superior race are meant to achieve big.ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read carefully:

We do have a "uniform code of conduct for all editors".
We picked you out because you are attacking. We pick out all such editors, very uniformly.
Wikipedia is about adding content from respected sources, period.
If you've got issues with articles, take it up on the appropriate article talk pages.
Soapboxing here is falling of deaf ears. Save your keystrokes.
Be civil or you will be booted off Wikipedia. No kidding.
Happy editing.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia dont have uniform code for all editors reason Citations with historians such as Helena Blavastky on aryan race has been declared that she dont know too much about aryan theory!!!!! and fake articles which relate tamerlane to genghis khan is still posted on your site.The answer is simple how the Top Brass of Nazi was so familiar with Sanskrit language , even most hindus dont know it only religious hindus know that language , therefore it is you who needed to boost your knowledge.Wikipedia has become let say some kind of site to propagate the rumors . Truth is hidden and all the fake material can be found here on wikipedia.

Thank you for being civil. I am pleased that you are not attacking people. That's a good start.

Now, you seem to feel strongly that some content in articles is incorrect. Fine. Here are two plans. You can pick one:

Plan A: Find good sources to support your facts. Then add the facts to the article, with references attached. If you've been warring on any particular article, it may be best to discuss it first on talk.

Plan B: Without providing any references, state how incorrect the information is again and again. Then, state over and over what the correct information is hoping everyone will listen and eventually be convinced.

If you think Plan A is best, well done! You are well on your way to improving Wikipedia's articles. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this is the problem , if i edit something even with references some other user will delete it.For example i want you to research about Kublai Khan the grand son of Genghis Khan he converted to Buddhis along with one of his brother and then formed a separate empire other from those mongols in middle east and europe who converted to islam still their is no mention of Kublai Khan becoming a Buddhist infact those mongols who converted to islam never belong to the family of Genghis Khan , two great khans out of 6 were buddhists and rest were shamist still that detail is not posted on Kublai Khan page, how can anyone be so ignorant if i edit that then someone jealous of buddhism will come and delete that now how can we maintain neutrality in that case.I recently deleted Michael jackson name from converts to islam they referenced the initial articles of "THE SUN" which has been regarded as fake newspaper with no credibility further the denial of the imam who allegedly converted Mj too denied that he converted MJ still MJ name was posted in conversion list. So my advice atleast for once check the details on Kublai Khan page he is a convert to buddhism and it is not mentioned at all .

I understand what you are saying, but, I don't see you having edited any Khan articles. Please, don't tell us facts here. Take that up on the talk pages. Cite good sources. Make your case there. You, my friend, will be very pleased when you add content supported by good sources. That content will stick like glue.

Please, add references to the end of the content like this:

<ref>http://www.example.com</ref>

not like this:

[http://www.example.com]

Please, use edit summaries, especially when reverting. (Before you click save, explain in the long box what the edit was about.)

Please, use spaces where appropriate, like this:

"...name Abdul Rashid, their daughter was..."

not like this:

"...name Abdul Rashid,their daughter was..."

Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i will take care of all those points which you mention.Thnx for help.

kublai khan edits

i want help from well established editors to plz consider adding atleast one section in Kublai khan though the page of kublai khan show many instances where he clearly supports Buddhism over any other religion but still the main point his conversion from shamanism to buddhism has been hidden, i am not editing because someone might say that the authors are not credible, therefore i want more experienced editors to research about kublai khan and then add a section of his conversion to buddhism, plus he also made buddhism the official religion of the mongol empire.I will be grateful for this otherwise the article based on Kublai Khan is completely incomplete if we remove the section of Conversion Of Ashoka the great from hinduism to buddhism then it may invoke protest similarly the conversion thing is not mentioned at all.ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk) 06:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of historians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Romila Thapar. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Saddhiyama (talk) 11:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Saddhiyama (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering what happened to our nice chat.

I thought you understood about discussing and getting consensus.

I thought you understood about warring.

I thought you understood about using edit summaries.

What happened? We're supposed to be friends. I spent all that time trying to give you good advice. Now, if you keep this up, you're going to be booted off Wikipedia. I know you don't want that. Then the articles will stay in a way you don't like, and you won't be able to do anything about it.

Again: Discuss, find sources, don't war. Really, it's the only good way to proceed. Good luck. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will request you that atleast for once plz go to the discussion page of romilla thapar, that user who is confronting me is unknown of indian dirty politics, i am firm on this view that the historian thapar is unknown of anything.Her knwoledge of basic history is nothing sort of disaster, plz atleast once visit the page i get angry when that particular user undo my edits regularly even though i posted source of the book written by thapar herself.ASHOKBINDUSARA (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will check out the sources more thoroughly. But I'm no expert. Sources by the subject aren't considered good sources. Please relax and take your time. There's not hurry at Wikipedia. Be patient. And, stay neutral. Stay calm. Take emotions out of the equation. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:46, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. rgpk (comment) 14:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]