User talk:ASH1977LAW
Hi - I regually edit wikipedia, mostly to correct obviously gramatical errors. Someone else at this isp has been vandalizing wiki, not myself. If possible, please disalow unregistsered editing from this isp — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASH1977LAW (talk • contribs)
We're unlikely to block an IP in this way. If you can point to malicious edits that have been made, we can look into it. Thanks. 〈REDVEЯS〉 11:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome, ASH1977LAW!
Hello, ASH1977LAW, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Fun stuff...
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 〈REDVEЯS〉 11:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Any chance that you can use the preview function when doing your edits? By using this you can see if there are any mistakes and correct them or add in new facts. It also has the benefit for editors such as myself to check out the changes made on the page and follow the progression especially since you have made almost 100 edits to this page in the last 10 days. Thanks :-) -- UKPhoenix79 02:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thats ok we all have a learning curve when trying new things... oh and don't forget to sign your comments :-D -- UKPhoenix79 03:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Chambers Range Reply
[edit]Hello. I replied to your insightful answer to our dilemma here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chambers_stove
Any ideas on how we could proceed without losing 30+ years of the history of the company? A definitive history of the Chambers Corporation isn't likely to be produced anytime soon... John E. Chambers 14:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
More than 2 editors is ok
[edit]- This has been discussed in the past, and it was determined that using WP:3O for more than 2 editors was okay. Smee 11:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- Right-oh. Sorry. I'll pop back and undo my revision (unless it has already be reverted). Sorry, my error. ASH1977LAW 12:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I put the entry back, and no worries, thanks for being so polite about it all. Smee 12:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- Right-oh. Sorry. I'll pop back and undo my revision (unless it has already be reverted). Sorry, my error. ASH1977LAW 12:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)