User talk:ASB95

Welcome!

Hi ASB95! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! RegentsPark (comment) 21:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hi ASB95! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Indian independence movement that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 21:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Solar reforming

Hello, ASB95,

Thank you for creating Solar reforming.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please rewrite, or it may be deleted

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 Thank you for taking the time to go through the article. I have tried to make the article as professional as possible with all scientifically accurate statements and with proper referencing to each claim. Please let me know if there are any specific issues that can be addressed. It would be great if the page is then patrolled and approved for indexing. Thank You!

ASB95 (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issues were pointed out by others before:

It reads like an essay, rather than a Wikipedia article. It should blandly state facts, please look at other articles.
It makes many statements which come across as opinions, and therefore are "original research". Some (not all) of the terms/phrases that need to be removed are:

strives for

Despite the interesting observations

these major historic

new players

And more. Please get help at the Tea Room. I think the topic of the article is fine, but it needs a massive rewrite. Wikipedia is picky. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. I have tried to address your specific points and made attempts to improve the article. Kindly have a look and modify to see if the tags can be removed. I am new to Wiki so not aware of how to use the tea room. Your advice is appreciated! Thank you again!

ASB95 (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have made a start, but far more is needed so I have restored the tag. I note that you quote [1] for almost everything. If that is your paper you need to declare a COI -- admins can (will) check. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did a little editing. Reading more carefully, there is far too much citing one group. This raises questions both of neutral point-of-view (WP:NPOV) and COI (WP:COI). I am not directly working in the area, but I do have some knowledge of upcycling and similar. There is masses of work in this area around the world, and I do not see this article as being balanced. You have to work much harder to make it representative of everyone, not just one group. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Solar reforming

Hello, ASB95,

Thank you for creating Solar reforming.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please do not remove this. You have only made very minor adjustments, major ones are needed. A full rewrite.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 Thank you for your useful suggestions. The [1] is not mine but a review discussing the topic in detail and hence cited. I have made the article more balanced with other relevant works are now mentioned in detail. Better structuring by others may be useful and appreciated. Thank you!

ASB95 (talk) 11:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]