User talk:AOCJoey

AOCJoey, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AOCJoey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AOCJoey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi guys. I'm really sorry if there has been confusion here but I am a little confused as to why I have been banned?! This is my first time on Wikipedia and I have a specific agenda which is The Eggplant and the Keep It Real Online campaign. I have read into the situation and see that I have been blocked because a few people with the same IP address have been editing similar pages, however, I am not one of those people. The UC didn't find conclusive evidence so I don't understand why I was blocked in the first place. I have spent hours making the two pages as reputable as they are and it seems unfair that I have been blocked due to common interests with a sockpuppeter. Is there anything I can do to prove that I am not related to the accused sockpuppeter? These campaigns are something that New Zealand deserve to know about as they are government-funded and provide New Zealand youth with tips and tricks about online safety. I really hope that we can resolve this as these are situations close to my heart. Kia Ora AOCJoey (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Utterly unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why are you editing the same articles as the other editors who were blocked? Do you know them? By the way, Wikipedia is not for things to people "deserve to know". It's for things that have already become widely known – what we call "notable". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is because they are all related to this new series in New Zealand. I searched up the key words:'The Eggplant' and saw that there was an article for two of the actors and there was a draft started for the series. From there, I started editing them. This is the only reason I can provide because it is what happened. The draft I began editing was poorly referenced and had zero credible resources, and therefore I researched the topic and found over ten credible references to ensure the credibility of the page. I then decided the strengthen the credibility and create a page for a widely known campaign here in New Zealand and worldwide called Keep It Real Online. This and The Eggplant are both very widely known things in New Zealand. It was the biggest mini series of 2020 here in New Zealand as stated on the website and in the government articles. And no, I do not personally know them. Does this mean I am not allowed to edit them? I'm sorry if it does because I didn't know that. AOCJoey (talk) 03:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Benpporter per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benpporter. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep It Real Online (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Keep It Real Online instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Perhaps you can add to the existing article?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keep It Real Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Keep It Real Online, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Keep It Real Online

Hello, AOCJoey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keep It Real Online, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]