User talk:ANTE RAKELA

Welcome!

Hello, ANTE RAKELA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

European Commission/Slovenian Presidency of the-EU 2008

Hi Ante! Just wondering if you are aware of this goverment report European Commission/Slovenian Presidency of the-EU 2008. Reports and proceedings of the 8 April European public hearing on Crimes committed by totalitarian regimes , organised by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (January–June 2008) and the European Commission. Page 197. Joze Dezman & page 163 Milko Mikola. Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about Balkans articles

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tito

If you know other reliable sources, provide them at Talk:Josip Broz Tito. General statements that they exist aren't productive. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Spellcast (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ANTE RAKELA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but I want know Spellcast's reasons of this sockpuppetry! Where is proof of this sock? I would like to meet this guy! You admins can suspect sockpuppetry of DIREKTOR and other accounts who have the same POV then to ban them: Spellcast's twisted logic is based on nonsense suspect which is blatant applied against who don't have his POV! For example, in this case: who is other banned user in Spellcast's wrong mind? Spellcast has the same DIREKTOR's political agenda! In this other case DIREKTOR reported Barba Nane claiming sockpuppetry of user:Luigi 28 and an admin banned him but here AlasdairGreen27 asserts The initial checkuser test about you was a false positive. You are not PIO, I know that. PIO was infantry, you are officer material. Your language style is different from PIO, your contributions are different, your ability to use sources is different and here Luigi asserts PIO is a real idiot: it is shameful to be compared to him. Evidence: Luigi is not Pio and if Barba Nane is other account of Luigi, no violation did it! Evidence: admins don't understand and are wrong in almost all cases! I request immediate unblock for blatant mistake in good or suspect bad faith of POV pushing admin!--ANTE RAKELA (talk) 5:13 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Blaming everyone else will not get your block lifted. Please review this guide and discuss your behavior, not someone else's. TN X Man 14:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ANTE RAKELA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but I don't discuss my behavior because Spellcast must explain his blatant meatpuppetry in DIREKTOR's political agenda! evidence are here:

1 Spellcast blaming alleged nationalists, friendly discuss with fanatic communist Yugoslav nationalist DIREKTOR!
2 nationalist DIREKTOR in other one edit war against honest Italian editors!
3Spellcast banned a my countryman!
4 Spellcast banned other account with edits only on sport!

My question is: does Spellcast consider PIO a globe trotter or he is total unreliable individual gambler?--ANTE RAKELA (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's enough for me. I'm disabling your ability to further post here. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.