User talk:ANAMIKA6SI

ANAMIKA6SI, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ANAMIKA6SI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello ANAMIKA6SI. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ANAMIKA6SI. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ANAMIKA6SI|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 20:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC) WILL YOU OR ANYONE PAY ME FOR Wikipedia? I Don't EVEN KNOW WHERE messages ARE to be sent . this is so complicated . I have taken entire day to create a profile and you are deleting it . Professionals are paid . I'm trying understand how to write Wikipedia. I started with Surabhi . why so much of aggression ? for you it took 5 second to delete my work . I took entire day to understand and write it . I'm trying to learn . in future you will see me with various topic. you have deleted all the work she has done . you can google her credentials. why are you being so angry and agressive ?? I have come to u for help. how to write new topics and how to protect them . instead of helping me you are being really bad to me . one credential is wrong then I delete her page . find out and then decide please. how to reply here ? is there any inbox like Facebook?[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hi ANAMIKA6SI, what is your connection to the users Shambhusingh1 and Anthour.layman? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 20:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 21:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC) sandbox is inbox ??[reply]

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing.

Please also stop removing maintenance tags and reverting the copyedits and cleanup other editors do. bonadea contributions talk 22:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why are you bullying me ??/ what do u you want ??? instead of helping you are behaving extremely bad

I am not bullying anybody. I have tried to make the article acceptable, but unfortunately you have been using several different accounts to restore it to a complete mess. Wikipedia must never, ever be used to advertise anyone or anything. --bonadea contributions talk 22:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE I REQUEST YOU TO NOT BULLY ME AND HELP ME I HAVE REPLIED TO YOU , IM NOT PAID . OK DO AS YOU WISH . I DONT WANT TO EVER WRITE Wikipedia ... YOU WIN

THIS IS NOT BULLY ?? THEN WHAT IS IT ??? INSTEAD OF HELPING YOU ATTACKED ME .

Speedy deletion nomination of Surabhi Prabhu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Surabhi Prabhu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 22:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 00:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Hi. I'm sorry, I am not interested in researching or writing that entry —an entry in which, you, yourself, suffer from a clear conflict of interest— at this time. You should review our guide to notability, in any case. If you wish to be unblocked, please write an unblock appeal, here, below this space. It will be reviewed by another admin. I do recommend you review the guide to appealing blocks closely before doing so. Good luck. El_C 13:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. You do not need to keep emailing me. You can just write whatever you see fit right here, on this page. I do not share my email address with persons I do not already know and trust, so no response via email will be forthcoming. Anyway, I think your use of the word "bullying" has been misplaced. We have a reliable sources guideline, which every editor needs to adhere to. It is nothing personal, I'm sure. Best wishes, El_C 15:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has violated WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK as Richardnyc878. However, they were immediately honest about this when confronted. This appears to be a case where they simply didn't know Wikipedia's policies. I therefore suggest this single instance of block evasion should not be held against them. --Yamla (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]