User talk:ALT.PARANET
Hello world!
My goal here is to inform, update, and correct. Feel free to drop me a line to discuss anything.
Notability
[edit]Hi, I noticed the sources that you added to Julius Weinberger. Please read WP:NOTABILITY. What the article needs are reliable, independent sources that have written about Weinberger; things he's written himself do not support notability. Schazjmd (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Schazjmd, I added the "Uri Award" ref which should satisfy notability (I hope?) ALT.PARANET (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I had to remove that. The source did not say he received the award; it said he should, meaning his idea was so outrageous, it should be a contender for an Uri award, which is not a good thing, nor does it contribute to notability. Take a look at WP:BASIC: you need multiple, independent sources that give significant coverage of Weinberger. Schazjmd (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- So you removed a citation from a reliable secondary source? I've clarified the quote and put it in context, now it should stay. It's historically significant. ALT.PARANET (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- I removed it previously because your text misrepresented what it said. The corrected version is fine, but adds nothing for notability. It's a brief mention (not significant coverage) that just says his idea was nonsense. Schazjmd (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- So you removed a citation from a reliable secondary source? I've clarified the quote and put it in context, now it should stay. It's historically significant. ALT.PARANET (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- I had to remove that. The source did not say he received the award; it said he should, meaning his idea was so outrageous, it should be a contender for an Uri award, which is not a good thing, nor does it contribute to notability. Take a look at WP:BASIC: you need multiple, independent sources that give significant coverage of Weinberger. Schazjmd (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
Thanks for your edits in support of seeking esoteric knowledge. I checked your edit history - great contributions! Bluerasberry (talk) 14:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Yogi Coudoux
[edit]Hello, ALT.PARANET, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Dawkin Verbier, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Yogi Coudoux, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Coudoux.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dawkin Verbier}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dawkin Verbier (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Yogi Coudoux for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yogi Coudoux, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Coudoux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Julius Weinberger for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Weinberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
jps (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)