User talk:AK0934

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Tripoli (1705). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barbary Crusade, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at List of wars involving Tunisia . Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of djerba and karknah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of djerba and karknah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Emirate of banu talis

Hello, AK0934,

Thank you for creating Emirate of banu talis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Book references require page numbers

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of wars involving Tunisia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 19:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been clearly warned to stop edit-warring. If you repeat your edit again without discussion, like this, the next recourse may be to report you to administrators, who may place restrictions on your account. R Prazeres (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i know i know i am not in a war you have to know AK0934 (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editors who edit war, and create sleeper accounts in the midst of edit wars, are very often socks.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I did not mean to upset anyone, and I did not understand any of your warnings, and I confirm that I only used one account, so I am sorry for any problem that occurred. AK0934 (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

AK0934 (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah

Hello, AK0934. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah

Hello, AK0934. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capture of djerba and karknah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AK0934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal the block on my original account, AK0943. I understand that I made a mistake by creating and using a new account (youssef khedhri 2011) while my original account was blocked. I now fully understand that this was a violation of Wikipedia's sockpuppet policies. I sincerely apologize for any confusion or disruption my actions may have caused. I recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and am committed to following them moving forward. I am genuinely dedicated to contributing positively to Wikipedia and would like to request the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to the community. If you could reconsider unblocking my original account, I assure you that I will abide by all Wikipedia policies and contribute constructively. I deeply regret the confusion my actions have caused and sincerely hope for another opportunity to contribute positively. I genuinely care about being a part of the Wikipedia community and am committed to adhering to all guidelines Thank you for considering my appeal. If there are any additional steps I need to take or further information required, please let me know.AK0934 (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I concur that a request before six months has passed will not succeed- and one after that is very unlikely to suceed that soon; at least a year or more is probably needed. I suggest that in the meantime you edit a Wikimedia Foundation project where you are not blocked(Simple English Wikipeida, Wikitionary, or another language Wikipedia in a language you may know) to build up a good edit history which might help you get unblocked here. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

come on when im being unblocked wikipedia you have to see my appeal i want to edit AK0934 (talk) 16:58 6 August 2024

Demanding to be unblocked has been helpful approximately zero times in Wikipedia history. Considering you're a blocked user who has sockpuppeted, there's already a very big trust deficit with you as it is. You're blocked precisely because at the moment, Wikipedia doesn't want you to edit and you have to convince an admin to change their mind and have faith in you. This is a very poor way to go about that. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can i contact an admin, why this site is so strict that "unblocke has been helpful approximately zero times in Wikipedia history." at least can you tell me where is wikipedia base or the wikipedia number, and im gonna be banned for ever from using wikipedia ?? please answer me AK0934 (talk) 00;06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

That's not what I said at all. I said demanding to be unblocked is never effective. In every one of your block notices across multiple accounts, there are numerous links about Wikipedia policies and a guide to appealing blocks. You would be wise to read those pages. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what pages ?? AK0934 (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note You were socking as recently as August 5. If you want to have a chance at being unblocked, you will need to follow the instructions at WP:SO.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
were should i "Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban." ?? AK0934 (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should make that promise in an unblock request, after a lot of time has passed. I doubt six months will be enough time given your repeated conduct. If you really would like to post again, you should wait a couple of years, making sure to have no edits on English Wikipedia during that time, meaning nothing on your talk page, no logged out editing to evade your block, and no more sockpuppets. Then make your case, as honestly as possible, and have concrete points showing you understand what you did, and how you will change your behavior if allowed to post again. And if you really want to have the best chance, become an active productive editor on another Wikimedia project. You're not blocked on any of them and you've already made a few edits to Arabic Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Being a productive editor who follows the rules elsewhere makes a more convincing case that you can be one here.

And just to get the idea out of your head, there's almost certainly no promise, no plea, no combination of words that will convince any admin to lift your block now, or anytime soon. You may not like the idea, but your only chance to return to English Wikipedia ever likely involves a significant amount of time away from it. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope"you should wait a couple of years" was an exaggeration from you. Otherwise I am willing to abide by everything you have written. AK0934 (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was not. You can try the minimum of six months in WP:SO, but I don't think the bare minimum will suffice. I'm only outlining for you what the most likely chance that you'll be able to post again is; you are quite free to disregard it. Please note that even this is far from a guarantee you'll be unblocked. Trust, once lost, is difficult to earn. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]