User talk:AJ2265

Welcome!

Hello, AJ2265, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Oxford to Bicester Line. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! samtar ^{t} 17:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Eva Simone Hayward

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Eva Simone Hayward, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! – Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi AJ2265. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2018-04-21. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to verify IP vandalism

Hi :) Maybe you could help me with this, as you stumbled across one of the edits yourself:

Vandalism by IP: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OECD_Better_Life_Index&diff=832678106&oldid=829362241&diffmode=source
Accidental revert to not-obvious, hidden maliciously bad version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OECD_Better_Life_Index&type=revision&diff=832706562&oldid=829362241&diffmode=source

There is more of this, probably reverted by people like you and me. Let's clean the mess up together. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about you, but just for your convenience and information: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Hard_to_revert_IP_vandalism ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For helping to clean up a mess of hard to identify, malicious vandalism. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outing concerns

Hi AJ. As an FYI, you should not ever use an editor's full name, even when it's obvious who the editor is, unless the editor has made it clear who they are on wikipedia itself. Thanks. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info - I've taken a read of WP:PRIVACY. AJ2265 (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi AJ2265. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chief executive officer

Hi AJ, I note your reversion at the above article. Things are getting close to edit warring there. A couple of points: the source is not a good one according to WP:RS (it's a blog with a political agenda). Could you please put arguments on the Talk page as to why you think this stat should prevail. Thanks, 31.52.166.58 (talk) 18:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on the talk page AJ2265 (talk) 18:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but I reverted your changes at CEO, simply because we're still discussing the issue. No reflection on the quality of the content. 31.52.166.58 (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AJ2265. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AJ2265. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CEO Page February 2019

Thanks for your review AJ2265 One more question then. The following page has over 20 references, literature listed, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming, how is this possible then if not a single reference was allowed to be added to Chief executive officer. In principle I agree with "Wikipedia is not a directory" but I think the CEO page could need a little bit more scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludwig.schreier.wiki (talk • contribs) 13:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AJ2265,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Azita Raji is no relation to the former amabassador to England under the Shah of Iran

Hi AJ2265,

Just a note to say that Azita Raji has no relation to Parviz C. Radji. Please do not link her bio to his.

Thanks. W — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikilleWi (talk • contribs) 06:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AJ2265,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AJ2265,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]