User talk:AI135

Koreanic languages

Hi AI135, thanks for registering, as it makes it easier to keep track of who's who. There is nothing "proven" about the classification you're reverting to. As for sources, the article now has rather a lot of them. I invite you to discuss your concerns at Talk:Koreanic languages. Kanguole 15:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ive read the cited sources... and nothing is valid enough to separate the previously established branches. Especially the Yukchin BS... but its okay, I knew Wikipedia was a joke but this just confirms it. Next time, keep biases and self motives out of history and the establishment of others, thanks

Please discuss on the talk page, Talk:Koreanic languages – edit summaries are not discussion. Kanguole 07:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Koreanic languages, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 20:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AI135, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AI135! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)