User talk:ACxcv

Welcome!

Hello, ACxcv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored

Hello, I'm Ian.thomson. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Runway. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Runway, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, you're now blocked from editing that article. If you continue to show that you're not here to contribute but engage on some prudish crusade based on your lurid fantasies instead of what's actually on this site, the block will be extended to all of your edits, not just for that article. After reading our guide to appealing blocks, you can try using the following template to appeal the block: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.}}

However, that's going to require accepting that you're going about this the completely wrong way. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Ian.thomson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of the personal attack suggests you're worldly enough to not be serious in your prior arguments about a link in the Runway article encouraging children to sexually abuse each other.

Find something positive to do, such as our tutorial on editing. If you approach me again for anything but a sincere request for help, or I see you bringing up the Runway article to anyone else, I'm blocking you as not being here to build an encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ACxcv! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:44, Monday, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

{This situation is regrettable, hope to clear this disagreement as soon as possible and also to direct my reasons here as clear as possible}

Until you can demonstrate that you understand what you did wrong (your goals as well as your ability to understand others, communicate, and edit cooperatively all had serious issues), we're not obligated to give you a second chance. In fact, when I blocked you from editing only from the Runway and not from anything else, that was your second chance.

You spouted off "reasons" why you believe the bikini waxing article should be censored, and then went for a complete different goal that was just as disruptive. It was explained to you that your claims had no basis in reality (children who are informed are harder to peer pressure or trick than children who are uninformed, bullies don't need our articles to come up with ways to bully people), nor in policy (Wikipedia is not censored), nevermind the issue of practicality (removing the link does nothing about the article and even removing the article would do nothing about literally the rest of the internet). You responded by edit warring and making personal attacks.

You need to demonstrate that you understand this. You need to explain the above, in your own words, with your insights as to how you will avoid this sort of behavior in the future. Until that happens, you're staying blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACxcv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous and regrettable, not just for me but for you as well. I'm in a very real world just like you. I can´t believe that you're actually trying to censor me, for saying that the reference in that page and the use of the picture is overrall degrading, misogynous, sexist, narrow-minded and gross. It bothers me that you're trying to make it sound as if I was crazy, and can't believe that you're actually trying to taught me into a good act behavior in wikipedia. Along with trying escalate to your own arguments and conclusions to trivialize sexuality and reducing it to a consumer object. I'm a sane and sound person. I can go as far I've made a beginner's edition mistake and that's all. It's still not OK for me. You could've picked up another kind of picture, it still bothers me.

Decline reason:

This reads like an explanation why you should be left blocked. If instead you meant to argue for having the block lifted, you'll want to read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request and address your inappropriate behaviour. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.