User talk:Bill at ACT Greens

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:ACT Greens Campaign Assistant, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mediran (t • c) 10:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there is no promotion going on. This is an account that is affiliated with an organisation, so the username refers to that organisation. But there is no promotion or advertising taking place on the user page. The purpose of this account is to make clear that photographs being reposted from the ACT Greens website or other sources are not in violation of copyright but are instead authorised by the party. I think this was adequately explained by the text left on the user page, which the person making the claim did not address. --ACT Greens Campaign Assistant (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message!

Hello, Bill at ACT Greens. You have new messages at Mediran's talk page.
Message added 11:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]