User talk:ACBContent

Welcome!

Hello, ACBContent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as NeoToonami, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Non-Dropframe _talk 00:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NeoToonami

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NeoToonami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 00:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Boy Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Invincible (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. Your recent edit to the page Grand Hustle Records appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The source cites Iggy is not signed to the record label. STATic message me! 19:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

I have again reverted your addition to Vortexx. We do not accept anything from nickandmore.com because they exist solely to churn out press releases from kids networks without critical commentary (and outright cheerlead for shows, something a reliable source never does). Not only that, all they did was quote the ad from Cynopsis as a source, which is not allowed. Do not readd it, or anything from nickandmore again. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 20:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why not so far everything from Nick and more has come true on the networks.

Might be, but we don't consider it a reliable source in any way. All they do is take content from other sites and put their own spin on it (no good news site would consider an advertisement in an email newsletter a good thing to source), and the obnoxious 'these networks can never do wrong' tact they have in their writing suggests no neutrality. Nate • (chatter) 22:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013 - The Legend of Korra

Hi, I recently reverted an edit you made at The Legend of Korra. Based on discussion and existing guidelines, consensus for the "season" vs "book" debate is to use "season" to describe a television season of Korra. You are welcome to participate in the discussion at Talk:The Legend of Korra, but please do not continue to resubmit information and phrasing that goes against consensus, or Wikipedia's established principles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the creators have said that The Legend of Korra will have 2 seasons consisting of 2 books each, season 1 being books 1 and 2, season 2 being books 3 and 4

Hi, sorry, but you're mistaken. Please read the discussion at Talk:The_Legend_of_Korra/Archive_2#Book_2_and_season_2 and Talk:The Legend of Korra#Books vs. Seasons where editors have agreed that recent information makes it more appropriate to discuss the books as seasons. If you continue to make changes contrary to that consensus, you may be blocked for edit-warring. Sandstein 07:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that that's not relevant, ACB. They could call each season a sandwich, and we could mention that in the article, but we writers of encyclopedic content do not refer to a television season as a sandwich. Please visit the the talk page for more information and to continue the discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come when the page was created it said The Legend of Korra will have 2 26 episode seasons each consisting of 2 books. Check the list of episodes page.

This is explained in Talk:The_Legend_of_Korra/Archive_2#Book_2_and_season_2. Basically, at that time, Bryan Konietzko, the show's creator, wrote on his blog that Nickelodeon ordered what are for internal accounting purposes two 26-episode-seasons . However, now that the "books" air a year apart, Nickelodeon itself is referring to the "books" as seasons. Therefore we, following the lead of the most recent reliable sources, do as well. Sandstein 14:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The creators Bryan and Michael said 2 seasons 4 books. Nickelodeon is advertising it as Book 2 as well not season 2. They are not referring to books as seasons like they did in Avatar:TheLastAirbender.

This conversation should be taking place on the article's talk page so that other interested editors can contribute to the discussion. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes ~~~~ and use colons at the beginning of your responses to indent your comments. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Game (rapper) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Turbo F.A.S.T.

Do you have a reliable source to back up that claim? Koala15 (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well other than their official twitter accounts http://www.imdb.com/company/co0186051/

We cannont use IMDB as a source cause it is user edited like Wikipedia. Koala15 (talk) 00:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would just wait for a better concrete source before adding the info. Koala15 (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's their official account go to their website click twitter and it leads you there, announcements are announcements.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]