User talk:A9l8e7n

A tag has been placed on Icy towers 1.3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:402007021905135415Kobe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:402007021905135415Kobe.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jbhs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jbhs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commons pictures of year 2006

I assert to have voted for 1 picture --A9l8e7n 01:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gears of war 2

An editor has nominated Gears of war 2, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gears of war 2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Washington Naval Orange Tree.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Washington Naval Orange Tree.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

look at oppose number 7 here and oppose 4 here Even though I probably won't be running for admin again, Theleftorium probably will, and so that is why he is opposing images. CTJF83 chat 22:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So if you're even thinking about ever trying to be an admin, don't do the images. CTJF83 chat 22:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hold up, your an admin, if so, tell me how i can work my way up in being so?--A9l8e7n (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not. That was my failed attempt at it. You can see part of the reason it was unsuccessful for me, and TheLeftorium was image issues. (Plus you can also see how anti-removing images I was) So if you are considering being an admin, don't have image issues. CTJF83 chat 23:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Facts on skin cancer

File:Sweetgum-2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Sweetgum-2.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SweetGum.JPG

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:SweetGum.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peacekeeper (benchmark)

A tag has been placed on Peacekeeper (benchmark), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 00:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes

Please weigh in on Talk:List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes#Inclusion of episode segment links, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 09:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1010201.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P1010201.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WashingtonNaval2011.JPG

The file File:WashingtonNaval2011.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nba allstar 2007 mvp" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nba allstar 2007 mvp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Nba allstar 2007 mvp until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]