User talk:A7109i

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Origin of the Azerbaijanis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 17:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Culture of Azerbaijan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jerium (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio giuliano

20:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A7109i (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I did everything on purpose, however, I understand my mistake, which was quite offensive mainly due to my bias. I'll try to prevent from doing this again, and would like to continue my editing in Wikipedia and leave the topics I vandalised in the past. Thank you for understanding. A7109i (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You worked hard to be exceptionally offensive. Wikipedia has no place for this. We are much better off without you having the ability to edit. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't try hard, and I know what I did was foolish, I want to continue editing on wikipedia, but on other aspects instead of politics. This site means a lot to me. Please, consider my request and be straightforward with me. A7109i (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A7109i (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was denied an appeal, I tried to be straightforward and honest, but apparently Wikipedia would be better off without me. I want to help expand articles, and keep certain up to date, and ignore others like the ones I vandalised. I want to assure you, I'll never vandalise again and make more constructive edits. I believe I deserve another chance, and this to be my last one because I swear on god, I'll never vandalise again, besides, I've made edits in the past on other accounts. I want to continue this. Please consider this appeal and give me well thought-out criticism instead of short, kind of unhelpful responses. Thanks for understanding. A7109i (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Self-admitted and confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All concerns about your egregiously offensive edits aside, given your claim that "I've made edits in the past on other accounts", you're definitely going to have to elaborate on that if you want your request to be considered. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My other account, which I use sometimes, and has been identified as the sockpuppeter of this account, has made some edits. It's name is U2CE for example. Only constructive edits made there! A7109i (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, fantastic, that makes this an easy decline. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A7109i (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my 3rd time writing, and hopefully my last. I in my opinion believe there was miscommunication during my last time, which feels a bit unfair to me. I've always been active on wikipedia, making anonymous edits etc. Only constructive things, I just these two times decided not to, solely out of free will, and I confess that it was dumb for me to do that. I want another chance here, and continue updating articles, like I did in the past. I will try to contribute posivitely from this point on only. Please understand. The other admin thought I abused on other accounts, yet I only made constructive edits there. They only existed because of a devices issue, which is irrelevant. Give me good feedback please, and tell me if there is a chance in me getting unblocked. A7109i (talk) 05:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand what "abuse of multiple accounts" means. Once you are blocked, the block applies to you as an individual, not just your account. You may not edit under any account or IP address until your block is removed. Even if you make constructive edits with another account, it is still block evasion, which is considered "abuse". I think your only pathway forward is the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Without acting on your request I'm going to suggest that perhaps you should just withdraw it for now and come back some time later when you aren't confronting the still-smoldering embers of your bridges. If you really are sincere that would least mean an appeal wouldn't be dismissed out of hand like these last two have been. Daniel Case (talk) 07:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These unblock requests are becoming a time sink. Given that any legitimate unblock request would have to come from your primary account, I am revoking talk page access here. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]