User talk:A1octopus/Archived Talk, May-Dec 07

Image:Julianmice.jpg

Hi, could you clarify the origin of this picture? Did you take it yourself? --Tony Sidaway 00:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, the picture is an audience photograph but it belongs to All About Eve's unofficial (but approved) website www.goony.nl/aae and was uploaded with the express permission of the site owner. It is quite likely I miss-tagged it since I was a novice editor back then. If that was the case please replace the tag with the most appropriate one. A1octopus 10:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mathew

Matthew David White is a very important member of our society here in Colorado. He is a great skier and his sister has straight As. She has already completed college mathematics by the age of 16. Matt's fatehr was the CEO of The Einstein Brothers Bagel Company!

This pettition is for you to put the article back!

signed by:

Bob Joe Max Billy John Jon Jhon Matt Bill Joane Jacob Sarah Emily Ryan Gray The monkey girl lots of 8th graders and allthelower school —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Og610 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I have replied this strange missive on your talk page. A1octopus 21:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J.R. Chandler and Babe Carey up for new deletion debate

As a commentor in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.R. Chandler and Babe Carey debate, I thought you might want to know that the debate has been re-started at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.R. Chandler and Babe Carey (2nd nomination) because of significant changes in the article during the debate. Mango juice^talk 17:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Matthew White

I have a dream: that every type of bread can be eaten by everyone in the community. Weather it be white, brown, or colored bread; this petition is a thing being written by my fingers in this very moment. Weather the weather is black, or gray, or thunder-stormy-sunny-with a little bit or snow or if the sun is shining so hard that you can cook an egg while driving around and sitting around in your hometown. And when your money is gone, stay away from my stash, and get your own because black and blue is the same as orange and turquoise. Because brain damage and the lunatic knock on my back door and hit me one more time as i ride along the 40z to freedom untill i am free and im not a badfish in thiss boulevard of broken dreams. So as you read this please tell me: where will the children play???

Anywhere they like, Og610, but not on Wikipedia. A1octopus 21:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Judd Vandal

Thanks for the help in cleaning this up. These accounts appear to be a sock of User:Trafficcontrol who started this about an hour or so ago. Wildthing61476 17:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, happy to have been of use. A1octopus 18:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Stroeh

It's ok to delete the Dan Stroeh article. I didn't mean to start an article for real; I meant to create it as a draft in my User space. I was planning on piling up a bit more research and relevance before "publishing" it. A speedy deletion would be an appropriate fate for this presently worthless article. Thanks for your vigilance, and sorry for my carelessness - Kenllama 20:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise, everyone makes mistakes. Not everyone is this gracious about it though, that's the first time I've ever been thanked for tagging an article for deletion. Also the speedy deletion was without predjudice - if the chap in question is notable then you are welcome to re-create the page if it's properly referenced. If you do publish a half-finished article that you are still working on, then use Template:Underconstruction to prevent it being CSD'd while you finish it. A1octopus 21:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for this information! -Kenllama 17:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Julian2a.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Julian2a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julianmice.jpg

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Julianmice.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. MER-C 12:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julianmice.jpg

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Julianmice.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 06:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-earth in popular culture - pre-DRV request notification

Hi there. I'm leaving a courtesy note to let you know that I am asking the closing admin to reconsider Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle-earth in popular culture. My arguments are laid out at User talk:Coredesat#Middle-earth in popular culture - pre-DRV request. As you took part in the original AfD, I'm notifying you so that you can add your opinion, either there or later if it goes to DRV. Thanks. Carcharoth 11:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen King's inspiration

Hello. Back in May you participated in an AfD discussion on Stephen King's inspiration. I have called this AfD for review as I believe it was deleted against consensus in the discussion. If you have a few moments, would you please read the review and weigh in with your current opinion? Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22#Stephen_King.27s_inspiration Many thanks. All the best LACameraman 15:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: KACE (company)

replied on my talk page to the discussion you started there. DMacks 17:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mainstreamalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mainstreamalbum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BandB ^{(talk•contribs)} 06:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have put the fair use rationale in there now. Unfortunately I cannot find away to stop the title part of the template saying that the article does not exist, when it clearly does. Could you let me know where I've gone wrong? A1octopus 12:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Returntoedenalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Returntoedenalbum.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 04:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have now added source and fair use rationale. Will try to get this done for every image I've uploaded in due course. A1octopus 19:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aaekcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaekcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aae1cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aae1cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aae4cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aae4cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Becauseican.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Becauseican.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over a Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]