User talk:A. T. Galenitis

Cu(glycinate)2

Thank you for being an attentive editor. My general reason for toning down mechanistic comments is my guess that my glancing at the Gillard paper and my familiarity with Cu(II) chem suggests that any mechanistic ideas are just that, ideas and conjecture. Rates are super fast and intermediates are ellusive for d9 complexes. Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! This is a very good point, I would not have otherwise elaborated had it not been for the specific mention in relative literature; glad to have cooperated on that article. Regards,

--A. Ts. Galenitis (talk) 00:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inorganic compounds list

I was looking at the list of inorganic compounds, and I noticed that some of the superheavy element compunds were missing. Do you know anything about this and can I help? UB Blacephalon (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hexachlorophosphazene

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hexachlorophosphazene you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hexachlorophosphazene

The article Hexachlorophosphazene you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hexachlorophosphazene for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hexachlorophosphazene

The article Hexachlorophosphazene you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hexachlorophosphazene for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pikrolimni (lake)

On 15 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pikrolimni (lake), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pikrolimni is the only salt lake in Greece, mentioned by Plato and Pliny, and nowadays known for its therapeutic mud baths? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pikrolimni (lake). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pikrolimni (lake)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leonidas Zervas

On 20 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leonidas Zervas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Leonidas Zervas was a Greek organic chemist who discovered the carboxybenzyl protecting group, and also served as Minister of Industry of Greece and President of the Academy of Athens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leonidas Zervas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leonidas Zervas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]