User talk:A. Roderick-Grove

Welcome!

Hello, A. Roderick-Grove, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that Darwin's theory of evolution is not a "philosophy", but is a solid fact, and genomic analyses from a multitude of observations are a robust support to it. Creationist views to the contrary, and Teach the Controversy, are best listed elsewhere, probably in a web forum? Thank you. Rowan Forest (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International School of Geneva; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZH8000 (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Hawley (Educator)

Hello A. Roderick-Grove,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Hawley (Educator) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, John B123. The article has not been copied from another source; I wrote it entirely myself on the basis of the available on-line sources. However, because (for the time being) the article is so brief and factual, it consists principally of a list of Hawley's academic and professional background. If the wording on this list coincides unduly with some of the sources on which it was based, I will be happy to modify it. But necessarily it must be chronological, so the possibility for variations are minimal. A mere list of academic qualifications and professional positions surely cannot constitute a copyright violation. Thank you for your understanding.A. Roderick-Grove (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page on David Hawley (Educator) has been recreated and reworded with all the sources for the information it contains duly referenced. No language from the sources has been copied and pasted. Only the titles of the institutions, degrees and positions necessarily remain identical to the information contained in the sources. Thank you. A. Roderick-Grove (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Hawley (Educator) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, David Hawley (Educator), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, A. Roderick-Grove. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page International School of Geneva, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Hawley (Educator)

Hello, A. Roderick-Grove. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Hawley (Educator), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Hawley (Educator)

Hello, A. Roderick-Grove. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Hawley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, A. Roderick-Grove. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Michael D. Aeschliman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone is prohibited. Thank you. 174.197.69.37 (talk) 17:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A. Roderick-Grove. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]