User talk:9dbfg

AfD nomination of Mark Hatten

An editor has nominated Mark Hatten, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Hatten and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mark Hatten, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deranged bulbasaur 06:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discontinue recreating the Mark Hatten article. Consensus was to delete this article, and it will be speedily deleted each time you recreate it. If you wish, you may dispute the deletion of the article at deletion review. Thanks, – riana_dzasta 06:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discontinue attempting to delete the article as thousands of people will continue to create it again, and it futile waste of time(it will speedily be created each time YOU delete it, consensus is to KEEP the article). More people have nominated to keep it! censorship is counterproductive to information. 9dbfg 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 13 March 2007[reply]

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear when I wrote about consensus. A discussion about this article has already been held, and consensus was to delete. – Riana _{agree to disagree?} 08:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not remove speedy tags from articles. – Riana _{agree to disagree?} 08:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit a closed AFD

If you feel that the the article should be kept, feel free to open a deletion review, but you can't edit AfDs after they've been closed. – riana_dzasta 06:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]