User talk:9TEN1225

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 06:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicating posts, deleting other people's comments, and wasting time.

New comments go at the bottom of the page, per WP:BOTTOMPOST. I moved your comments there, because they were interfering with other comments. Your additions broke the formatting of the page, and deleted existing, resolved talk page comments.

I also closed the section, because it was pointless. Wikipedia isn't a forum for debate. We summarize reliable sources, and do not allow WP:FRINGE content, such as Pizzagate, to be misrepresented as factual. At no point will the article violate biography of living persons policy by humoring this nonsense, and BLP is non-negotiable, so there is no point in discussing this. Grayfell (talk) 06:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pizzagate

Howdy hello! If you would like to help honestly improve the Pizzagate article, please add new comments at the bottom of the page under a new header. Please keep comments concise and to the point. If you post walls of text, they will generally not be read. And please remember, Pizzagate is a conspiracy theory. It is under strict editing restrictions and is subject to WP:ACDS. We are not going to claim it happened. We are not going to call it not a conspiracy theory without exceptional sourcing. And we are not going to neuter the tone of the article per WP:DUE. If you have questions, please leave a message on my talk page by clicking the "edits ho" part of my signature. But please keep comments brief. Smooth sailing, Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saetia95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Saetia95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 October 2019 (UTC)