User talk:99.225.136.84

August 2010

Your recent edit to the page University Canada West appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 15:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Ronz (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Ronz (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to University Canada West, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for persistent edit-warring and disruption. Enigma^msg 18:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of universities in Canada. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [2] --Ronz (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked before I could even finish a report on your editing. While that report has been closed and archived, I should have notified you regardless. --Ronz (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [3] --Ronz (talk) 21:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an admin for a reason. Wikipedia wont let employee's of diploma mills be admins. You fail —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.136.84 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 30 August 2010

Courtesy notice

Your editing is being discussed here --Ronz (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other ip's used by this editor

Please comment if I'm mistaken: --Ronz (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University Canada West. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Me-123567-Me (talk) 04:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You would be wise to actually read the edits before blindly reverting - I fixed the poor reference, and expanded the information from the reference to actually make sense. As it sits now, the statement is misleading and incorrect, and the reference is indirect (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a report here --Ronz (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at University Canada West. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Son of Stan, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 01:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. [4] --Ronz (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.