Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Immediately cease your promotion of racism in the context of the advance of a political ideology, especially since you present it as incontrovertible truth that cannot even be questioned. It's not like you can stop anyone from changing IP addresses anyway, can you. (You), as in people like you, will not have the ability to abuse hierarchial power like this much longer, and it's because you revel in doing the exact things you say you fight against.97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Twink (gay slang). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
The consensus is just going to be that this form of racism is morally justifiable and socially acceptable, why would I waste my time doing that? Would you? 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You mean how you manufacture consent to the prevailing neoliberal-progressive political ideology that grew out of frankfurt school critical theory and ecstatically does every single thing it claims to justify itself by fighting against? Because I'm well aware no matter how well I argue or how many philosophers I cite, this form of racism is seen as socially acceptable and morally justified. For now! 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So I can just cite any political screed so long as it's in JSTOR or an equivalent right? Because that's what makes something reliable right? 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You left a message that states: "Why is this specific form of racism justified to you?" I never said any form of racism was justified, what I have done is requested that you stop edit warring and changing IPs to remove content that cites reliable sources without first obtaining consensus on the article's talkpage. The issue that I have is not that the content is being removed, but the way in which you are doing it. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How else am I supposed to do it? I know this website is entirely controlled by leftist political extremists who think that sort of talk isn't racist at all and probably have wet dreams about declining white demographics. I'm only participating this much in the process because I'm genuinely interested to see just how far down the rot goes, because like if I can't even like twinks on pride month without being lectured by some horkheimer wannabe about how white people are evil in every single possible context that drives me insane on a theoretical level on how anyone can even hold such contradictory ideas. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to White demographic decline appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Melmann07:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there an article for every single other ethnic group or demographic that exists, as regards racism against them, but there is no article for racism against whites? I know why, you people blocked it, I have archives of the discussion that led to that on internet archive. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This entire website is just a propaganda platform unless it's an extremely technical STEM article and sometimes even then nowadays, I would delete this entire website if I could. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware of that, sure, but why is it just a category, not a whole page? every single other group has a whole page, some of which could be condensed into novellas
Also, there was going to be a page for racism against white people, but its creation was blocked by political editors and admins on here basically saying that nobody needed it and it was a bad thing because it would make people think that white people experience racism (they do).
white people are apparently not allowed to have that and also everyone should celebrate declining white demographic numbers until none exist anymore, it'll be better for the world (right? that seems to be how a lot of people think and it's worth your life to point it out basically) 97.94.230.26 (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
they actually even deleted the internet archive upload I made to ensure I had evidence of that into the future (I wish I was just a schizo honestly hahaha)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
To edit, please log in.
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Twink (gay slang) . Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Twink (gay slang). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:97.94.230.26 reported by User:Wikipedialuva (Result: ). Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to White demographic decline appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Melmann 07:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to White demographic decline. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
