User talk:97.68.156.197

October 2018

Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Taking the piss have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Orphan Wiki 22:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wayne Newton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry. I meant for it to be constructive. Reporting on a widely held opinion. But maybe I'm biased, as a REALLY big fan here. 97.68.156.197 (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Hummerrocket. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pete du Pont seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hummerrocket (talk) 00:58, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Phil Crane. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hummerrocket (talk) 00:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry. Phil Crane and Pete Du Pont are my heroes. I guess I just got carried away. 97.68.156.197 (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sarasota–Bradenton International Airport— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at White Dawg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 22:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White Dawg, you may be blocked from editing. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Chip Berlet. Binksternet (talk) 22:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

How is it defamatory? It's just an attributed quote.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Chip Berlet. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Cognition. Binksternet (talk) 22:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Also active as Special:Contributions/2600:1006:B065:18BD:0:0:0:0/52. Binksternet (talk) 22:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

I just feel that it's relevant that the subject of the article also edits Wikipedia? Why isn't Wikipedia worth mentioning? The site is very highly trafficked and influential. With that said, an arbitration case is an important matter is well.

September 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martyr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Republicans who opposed the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign, you may be blocked from editing. Captainllama (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---