User talk:97.112.226.191

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Kompress0 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.226.191 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This isn't doing anyone any good, and is only a waste of time for everyone involved. How about you leave me alone and I go back to making constructive edits? 97.112.226.191 (talk) 00:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

97.112.226.191 (talk) 00:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having now read the IP talk page User talk:97.112.236.168, I've extended the block to one month, and made it a rangeblock. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also User talk:71.49.192.248. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request too

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.226.191 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've already covered that I understand what I've been blocked for. You just didn't like it. I was blocked because a few established users behaved like petulant children and benefited from bias while edit warring and continually reverting my valid edits. Quit asking if I understand the reason I've been blocked if you don't actually want to hear the reason I've been blocked. I was TRYING to make constructive edits the entire time. 97.112.226.191 (talk) 00:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 02:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock three

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.226.191 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

TRY ACTUALLY READING WHAT I PUT HERE INSTEAD OF JUST IGNORING IT. I understand exactly why I was blocked, I'm not going to lie and pretend I did anything wrong when I didn't. I was blocked because of bias and spiteful registered users stalking me and reverting my valid edits. I TRIED moving on from an edit war and going on to be a constructive editor but was followed by Jacona who reverted the one single valid, sourced edit I made on the mosquitofish page. 97.112.226.191 (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're evading a block. It doesn't matter if your edit is right or wrong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked for time-wasting. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:51, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.