User talk:96.245.37.202

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Elon Musk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 19:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SQL ^{Query Me!} 19:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.245.37.202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Was attempting to engage in a civil debate, while being told to "f*** off" by editors/administrators 96.245.37.202 (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Can't say I blame them. Clearly you want to return to the same behavior if unblocked, so there is no reason to remove the block. I'm sensing some transphobia here, take it elsewhere. 331dot (talk) 20:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Personal Attack Removed

(Personal attack removed) 2604:2D80:6A8D:E200:F0B5:4C8F:CCBF:5280 (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, seriously mad that I'm just taking Elon at prosecute's own word? Misgendering people is wrong. 96.245.37.202 (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So is being a WP:SEALION. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't talk in Wikipedia nerd speak, you'll have to have a human conversation if you want to debate on my talk page. You are objecting to my interpretation of Elon's statement regarding Elon's pronouns? That's several layers deep. 96.245.37.202 (talk) 20:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are all objecting to your WP:CIVIL WP:POV pushing that, like Elon's tweet, is clearly meant to demean people who care about identifying people by their preferred pronouns. And if you don't care to read about wiki policies, your block can be extended and we can take away your ability to edit this talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I object to your analysis that Elon's tweet is "clearly meant to demean people who care about identifying people by their preferred pronouns." This is your subjective analysis of prosecute's tweet, but is certainly not based in the fact required to make objective entries into an encyclopedia. In fact, it could also be argued that you yourself clearly don't care about identifying people by their preferred pronouns, since, taken at Elon's word, prosecute has stated fauci's preferred pronouns clearly today and you are refusing to allow discussion on them. 96.245.37.202 (talk) 20:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had enough of this. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2023

Hello, I'm Clyde H. Mapping. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rabia Chaudry—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 01:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.