User talk:92.40.212.157

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 92.40.212.157, may be shared by multiple users using public terminals or a Wi-Fi hotspot, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock or Template:School block. Public terminals and Wi-Fi hotspots may have set expiry times (usually in 30- or 60-minute intervals); consider this in deciding a block duration. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation; network administrators may be able to disable access to the network by offenders.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Lede at 1990 United States Census

The lede at 1990 United States Census needs to be altered. It's true that the census was the first to be conducted by a woman, but that doesn't need to be the first thing mentioned in the article. I'd propose moving it down further into the body. 92.40.212.157 (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I have moved this request to Talk:1990 United States census.~~ Tollens (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking again it appears you should be able to edit the article directly – you're more than welcome to do so and don't need to ask for permission first. Tollens (talk) 09:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 92.40.212.153 (talk) 10:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 Rhode Island Republican presidential caucuses (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The comment left by The Herald was:

The previously raised suggestions are still not addressed. Submitting again and again without fixing the raised issues will not get the article accepted and they constitute as disruptive editing as you are clogging up already backlogged AfC log. Kindly fix the issues before resubmitting again. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2016 Rhode Island Republican presidential caucuses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 92.40.212.157! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Al Gore 1988 presidential campaign, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me!? This is getting ridiculous. Next thing I know, I'll be dragged to some noticeboard over this whole fiasco.. 92.40.212.157 (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked for edit warring

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Al Gore 1988 presidential campaign.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.40.212.157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see that I've been blocked for a day for violation of the WP:Edit warring guideline. I understand that I had been reckless by reverting to my preferred version of the Al Gore 1988 presidential campaign article several times, and that, while I did raise the issue at the talk page, I should not have continued to revert after User:The Herald disagreed with my change to the article. I should have decided to seek consensus at the talk page, instead of violating the three revert rule. I wholly and completely understand that my decision to do this was not helpful and not a net positive to the encyclopedia. I will ensure that I will seek consensus for my changes before I use any further reverting of content. Thank you.

Decline reason:

That has nothing to do with the current block. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sergio Pablos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.