User talk:92.3.217.47

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Talk:Mel Gibson. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not libellous. Check his lawyer's words and the five tapes. (92.3.217.47 (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The current news is that the tapes have been altered. Catch up. Yworo (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then why has his lawyer admitted they haven't? Catch up. (92.3.217.47 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Mel Gibson. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Mel Gibson. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yworo (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Talk:Mel Gibson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yworo (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Mel Gibson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yworo (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hardly call The New York Times a poor source. Until it has been proven that the tapes have been altered in any way this needs to be discussed. You are not allowed to removed sourced material from a talk page for no reason. (92.3.217.47 (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyCarter for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Yworo (talk) 15:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no sock.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block extended for socking. EyeSerene^talk 17:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.