User talk:92.2.40.111

June 2020

Hello, I'm Pudeo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Core Issues Trust, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Whether an organization is classified as a hate group is contentious information and it always needs a source. Pudeo (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop

Stop deleting my edits you mug. They are a hate group. Look at their values.

No. A Reliable source that describes them as a hate group is needed. Doing that judgment by reading their values is original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia. --Pudeo (talk) 18:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User_talk:92.2.40.111, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Darren-M talk 12:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Gardo Versace. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Core Issues Trust seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gardo Versace (talk) 15:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 'issues' is the incorrect choice of word. Homosexuality isn't an 'issue'. Choose another word.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Core Issues Trust. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gardo Versace (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, saying homosexuality is an 'issue' isn't a neutral tone. I will keep editing it.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Core Issues Trust, you may be blocked from editing. Gardo Versace (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Core Issues Trust shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gardo Versace (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Core Issues Trust. Tarheel95 (Talk) 16:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Tarheel95

Hello, 92.2.40.111. You have new messages at Tarheel95's talk page.
Message added 16:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tarheel95 (Talk) 16:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Gardo Versace (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.