User talk:92.13.66.2

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hidetaka Suehiro, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Mdann52 (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hidetaka Suehiro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Mdann52 (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Hidetaka_Suehiro. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not use edit summaries to attack users TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hidetaka Suehiro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Mdann52 (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your Edits

Your edits recently have been problematic for the following reasons:

1. You remove the See Also section from Hidetaka Suehiro without providing an edit summary.
2. You frequently use inappropriate edit summaries.
3. You are edit warring on Hidetaka Suehiro.
4. You are making personal attacks against other editors.

If you keep this, up you'll get blocked. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 11:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC).

On the other hand, the IP turned out to be correct about the link already being there (and only stopped using the edit summary when he had repeatedly mentioned the reasons for the removal), and the other editor was edit warring just as much and incorrectly reported the IP for vandalism. What about WP:3RR? I agree about the personal attacks / inappropriate edit summaries though. Nczempin (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I admit the IP was right - a software glitch only displayed the part afler the pipe o the window. Therefore, I think WP:3RR would be a bit excessive - I understand and accept what I did wrong, therefore I am also willing to ignore th Personal attacks against me. Mdann52 (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Manchester United W.F.C. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---