User talk:911plantisimo

ALEXHEAD8835 NEEDS TO STOP EDITING VIVA PAGES!!!!!

If you have a problem with my sourced information, please feel free to discuss them. Alexhead8835 (talk) 23:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. As has been explained above, if you disagree with other editors then you can discuss your reasons with them, and try to reach agreement, but simply repeating your preferred edits over and over again, known as edit warring, in the hope that others will eventually give up and let you get your way, is not the way that Wikipedia works. I also notice that your edits have been reverted by a number of different editors, showing that consensus is against your editing. Wikipedia works by collaboration, and we all have to accept consensus, even if we personally disagree with it. Another point is that content should be able to be supported by references to reliable sources, and if anyone removes or challenges unsourced content it must not be re-added without the provision of sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that you have used more than one account. Is this so? If it is, then please state exactly what accounts you have used, and it would also be helpful if you would explain why you have used multiple accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]