Jump to content

User talk:90.255.142.14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Noronhomys. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (90.255.142.14) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! —mikemoral (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --90.255.142.14 (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

[edit]

Er, Acroterion in what sense is this account guilty of block evasion? --90.255.142.14 (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.255.142.14 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am unclear why this static IP has been blocked. I suppose I can get a new IP by resetting the modem, but first I'd like to see Acroterion's rationale for the block. 90.255.142.14 (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, not an unblock request, since you are just asking the blocking admin for clarification. 331dot (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.255.142.14 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why was I blocked? The blocking admin, who didn't even leave a block notice, has no interest in clarifying anything. --90.255.142.14 (talk) 11:59, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact that you threaten to evade this block makes things pretty clear to me. Declining request, removing TPA. 331dot (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.