Jump to content

User talk:8F062799

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, 8F062799, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2,000 Mules (April 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 8F062799! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The message said that I hadn't cited enough sources. I think more sources will become available after the movie gets released, and I may try again at that point in time. 8F062799 (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

8F062799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP address. My account is new. I was able to edit yesterday from a different IP address. I have access to multiple computers, depending on the time of day and which day it is. I would like all of these IP addresses to be usable for editing. 8F062799 (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

8F062799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP address. My account is new. I was able to edit yesterday from a different IP address. I have access to multiple computers, depending on the time of day and which day it is. I would like all of these IP addresses to be usable for editing. My Public IPv4 on this computer is: 71.61.58.117 My Public IPv6 on this computer is: 2001:558:6035:23:b527:921f:1a10:d1d5 8F062799 (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason to believe this is a shared IP address. I have blocked you as a  Confirmed sock of Grundle2600. Yamla (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.
Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

8F062799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I did was add relevant, reliably sourced content to articles. 8F062799 (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

8F062799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never "abused" any accounts. All I ever did was add notable, reliably sourced material. I did use (but did not "abuse") multiple accounts, because the authoritarian moderators kept censoring my notable, reliably sourced content. Go look at my edits from any or all of my accounts. All I ever did was add notable, reliably sourced content. I never "abused" any account. The moderators are guilty of censorship. 8F062799 (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are engaged in block evasion. That is abuse of multiple accounts. Since this clearly isn't going anywhere, I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:8F062799&oldid=1085517972"