User talk:87.70.97.132

the proposed pages

I've been traveling so I haven't had time to get to some of the items.. I'll be ready within a week. Sorry about the inconvenience : ( WhisperToMe (talk) 03:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are all already done...--87.70.97.132 (talk) 08:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing article talk page posts made by others

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Esther (1986 film), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do anything like this again, unless you have a very strong policy or guideline based for doing so as explained in WP:TPO. Removing a legitimate talk page post left by other editors in good-faith is one of the quickest ways to end up having your account blocked by an administrator. You’re welcome to respond to the post or even ignore the post if you like just like anyone else. Since you seem fairly new to Wikipedia, this can be written off as a newbie mistake; please just don’t do it again. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What part of Please just do not do anything like this again didn’t you understand? If you want to respond and say you addressed the concerns raised, then do that. Archiving a post for no apparent reason other bthan to get it off the talk page is not appropriate and can give others the impression you’re trying to WP:OWN the page. Other editors may be watching the article and may decide to comment. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I solved the problem, as you can see. Now, can we please archive this? These trivialities being here uglify my work. Thanks.--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not in any way owned by you. So, if you’re more interested in your work looking good than editing collaboratively with others, you’re going to quickly find yourself having issues with all kinds of others. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is the issue you raised not solved by me now? If so, why does that trivial uglifying notice need to be there anymore? And, re your most recent comment (cannot comment there myself), again, I addressed the issue and it is fixed now, I did not, contrary to what you wrote, just deleted your notice, so, why must it stay there rather than be archived?--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Most of your edits to date seem to be focusing on Esther (1986 film) and Berlin-Jerusalem. When a new editor focuses mainly on one or two articles, including creating them, their contributions can easily perceived as an apparent conflict of interest. Wikipedia doesn’t expressly prohibit conflict of interest editing, but it does highly discourage it. So, if you are in any way connected to these films or anyone associated with them, then you should carefully read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and try to follow it as closely as possible. It’s best to be as upfront as possible if you have a COI because it will not only make easier to for others to help you if you get stuck on something, but it will make others more likely to want to help you. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I am in no way connected to anybody who worked on those films. Working now on distributing the citations more evenly.--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but it might be a good idea to switch your focus to something else for a bit to add some balance to your contribution history. A new IP who shows and starts creating articles translated from other language Wikipedias, etc. may find their edits highly scrutinized by others since most newbies would be lost doing such a thing. The articles were approved by AfC so they are likely safe from deletion; so, stepping back a bit and seeing what edits others might make could be a good thing. You could always ask someone belonging to a relevant WikiProject or request WP:PR for feedback as well. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your recent editing history at Talk:Esther (1986 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I solved the problem, as you can see. Now, can we please archive this? These trivialities being here uglify my work. Thanks. Is the issue you raised not solved by me now? If so, why does that trivial uglifying notice need to be there anymore? And, re your most recent comment (cannot comment there myself), again, I addressed the issue and it is fixed now, I did not, contrary to what you wrote, just deleted your notice, so, why must it stay there rather than be archived?--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Helicopter String Quartet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kpg jhp jm 12:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No real reason given. All these photo additions and minor corrections unconstructive? Reverting.--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Helicopter Sting Quartet. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (87.70.97.132) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Kpg jhp jm 12:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please just do not revert my edits without real reasons though:)--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) : Sorry for the revert there . I misunderstood part of your change as unconstructive. Nut on looking back in the diff I found nothing wrong . Kpg jhp jm 12:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thank you!--87.70.97.132 (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.