Jump to content

User talk:87.36.25.38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kristin Cavallari has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Brody Jenner constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brody Jenner, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Brody Jenner was changed by 87.36.25.38 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-22T13:17:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. 87.36.25.38 (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone revert Living on the Edege's last aired date. How do we know it has been cancelled?87.36.25.38 (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 13:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. waggers (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Katie White and Jules De Martino did meet at Leeds University.87.36.25.38 (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.36.25.38 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to leave someone a message.

Decline reason:

get facebook or myspace then. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and we don't do "shout-outs"— Jac16888Talk 14:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.36.25.38 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It's to someone who said the ting tings' leeds uni claim wasn't true

Decline reason:

No reason given why you want to be unblocked. — Kanonkas :  Talk  14:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.36.25.38 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to remove nonsense from the ting tings' talk page.

Decline reason:

Still no valid reason for unblock given. — Aitias // discussion 15:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.