User talk:87.102.17.182

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 87.102.17.182, is registered to Kingston Communications and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

April 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mark Brennan (Neighbours), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 21:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Neighbours characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 01:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Vanessa Villante, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 12:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vanessa Villante, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - JuneGloom Talk 17:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Bianca Scott, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 00:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa's departure has NOT been confirmed by the Home & Away site, Lisa herself, TV Week or UK site digital spy. It's only speculation she will be leaving from an article posted in October. So it should be change till it's 100% confirmed by TV Week.

November 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Zad68 01:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kate Ramsay seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Ramsay with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. TheMesquito (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Ramsay with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. TheMesquito (talk) 20:34, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Ramsay. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kate Ramsay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|classification= [[List of past Neighbours characters#R|Former; regular(returning]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Ramsay, you may be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 16:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Ramsay. – JuneGloom Talk 23:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Turner (Neighbours), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 01:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Ramsay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please stop sockpuppeting and removing content. – JuneGloom07 Talk 16:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Ramsay, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 16:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the link for the source. So my edit should stay as I put it. They wouldn't have put that in the article if it wasn't true.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 16:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.102.17.182 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me so I can use wikipedia. Would like help in using wiki. When I try and add links, they never don't direct properly.eg. when I post a link to an article, it doesn't actually go to the article in the link but goes to the main page of the site. Maybe if I understand how to add sources properly I won't post edits without links. 87.102.17.182 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.102.17.182 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I gave a reason to unblock me. When I edit wikipedia, links don't seem to work for me, so I just add the information without the link. I will make some useful contributions to the site if someone helps me with posting links properly, so they direct to the correct article. Since links/sources didn't work for me, I just put write a short sentance from the source. I will not disrupt anymore articles without proper sources/links. It was a lot easier to edit wikipedia without posting links, as links never worked for me. 87.102.17.182 (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This IP is blocked for evading a block on the User:Gillyh account, and that is what you will need to address if you want to be unblocked - when an account is blocked, the person behind it is not allowed to edit, not using the blocked account or any other account, and not while logged out. The original block needs to be appealed at User:Gillyh. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

87.102.17.182 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't access the talk page for my User:Gillyh account. so can you please use this accept this as my reason. When I edit wikipedia, links don't seem to work for me, so I just add the information without the link. I will make some useful contributions to the site if someone helps me with posting links properly, so they direct to the correct article. Since links/sources didn't work for me, I just put write a short sentance from the source. I will not disrupt anymore articles without proper sources/links. It was a lot easier to edit wikipedia without posting links, as links never worked for me. 87.102.17.182 (talk) 22:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your repeated violations of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK at all, and that's why you have been blocked. Yamla (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why can't you access the talk page for your User:Gillyh account? You're not blocked from editing it and it is not protected. What happens when you log in as User:Gillyh? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot my password, so can't log in to my gilly account.

You appear to have an email address set up for that account, so you should be able to reset your password - see Help:Reset password for details. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

87.102.17.182/Gilly, you weren't blocked for not adding links (which you seem to have done just fine here [1], unless it's internal links you're having trouble with?). It was the sockpuppetry, the disruptive edits, the blanking of sourced content and the edit warring. Looking at your history across all accounts, nothing has changed in almost ten years. If your IP(s)/named account is unblocked, I really hope you start contributing constructively. Perhaps take the time to read up on the policies and guidelines, and please think about the people who put in the time and effort to maintain these articles. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Home and Away characters

I would have hoped by now that you knew that Facebook is not considered to be a reliable source. If you cannot provide a reliable source confirming the character's departure in June, then don't edit or remove sourced content until you can. Even if we could use that Facebook post, it says nothing about George Mason's departure, so it would be original research. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of current Home and Away characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 23:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 23:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.