User talk:86.26.26.107

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnnalesSchool, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly deny the allegation and challenge Dr K to produce the evidence! I think Dr K has to examine his motives and look into his heart. I believe it is because AnnalesSchool was instrumental in convincing the admins that a total revamp of the Greco-Italian war article was needed as the article was held hostage by a small clique of Greek users who erroneously and perhaps maliciously believed they owned the article to promote their peculiar pro-Greek view of the war. That has since changed and so I believe that while I am not AnnalesSchool, Greek editors like Dr K harbor a deep and visceral hatred to the point where they are completely paranoid that any anonymous user, could actually be AnnalesSchool, who has proven to be their scourge and terror! 86.26.26.107 (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I opened the SPI case against you. The evidence I have presented is here - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnnalesSchool. If you wish to write a response pls feel free to do so there. Anotherclown (talk) 22:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.26.26.107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You know this will never work, don't you? The truth cannot be blocked indefinitely. Many articles dealing with Italy's role in the war need a new re-think.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. WP:TRUTH may apply as well. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.