User talk:86.22.8.235

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

This user loves Wikipe-tan, the cutest personification of Wikipedia.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Talk:Tamil language. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (86.22.8.235) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! —SpacemanSpiff 15:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User 86.22.8.235, My name is Jesse Figueroa, AKA, user JesseAF13. I would like to state that I feel that my recent contributions to Bastille's band page were constructive. You see, another user, by name of USAQuidditch continually posted false information on the band's page, changing the lineup of the band, often removing current members, and replacing them with members from a 70s-era band known as Devo. After doing extensive research, ensure that Bastille's members were still, in fact, part of the band, I decided to fix the problem myself. Eventually, the user USAQuidditch, (which by now was also being noticed by fellow users), kept reverting my correct edits to his erroneous edits. This continued back and forth, eventually other users also attempting to fix the edits done by user USAQuidditch. I will admit that this resulted in an edit war, something I did not intend. But, the point I am trying to make is I feel that my contributions were justified. I was simply trying to keep the page true to its meaning, separating facts from falsehoods. I tried to do my part, to keep Wikipedia a reliable source of information. I feel that, if disciplinary action is to be taken, it should be toward user USAQuidditch, the source of the erroneous edits, not to myself, or any other users. I do agree with protecting the page for Bastille from further vandalism, and, while I am not trying to excuse my own accidental edit war, or be disrespectful in any way, I think action should be taken in the right places. Please contact me on my user talk page, if you wish address anything I have mentioned. Thank you in advance. Apologies, and thank you for your time. - Sincerely, JesseAF13. JesseAF13 (talk) 19:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:Serols— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Serols. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Serols, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 10:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I said it's not vandalism. It's a user warning. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Serols, your revision history shows you engaged in an edit war, but the template that shows you in an edit war is not vandalism, and you could get blocked for edit warring, Why do you keep reverting? The 3 UW templates that shows I was vandalizing a user talk page are mistakes, and blocking is not what I want to get. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 10:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You really don´t know, what edit-war is. --Serols (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring is repetitive reverting in a page, even if the user violates the 3 revert rule. Why was the one edit I did to Talk:Matiur Rahman (military pilot) and the 3 edits to User talk:Serols reverted? 86.22.8.235 (talk) 11:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you don´t know. what edit-war is: 1 2 3 - that was a fight against vandalism. --Serols (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This last reply shows that I know what edit-warring is, and the edit wars that almost got me blocked was an edit wars about blanking. I am sorry for warning you that you were in an edit war. I don't want to get blocked. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 86.22.8.235, there are three warnings needed by a user to block - see here. --Serols (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also intervene against vandalism , such as vandalism villains. From IPs to Admins, they can revert vandalism. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 13:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Pikachu are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 15:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I notice this, but 4 skins (Pika, Char, Bulba and Squi) are skins that can be used in agar.io. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 16:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lollipop Emoji

Re your comment here, the best solution would probably be to create redirects to the 4.4 names of the files. Anomie ⚔ 20:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best idea but I would probably need Ebrahim to do this because he is the one in charge of the images I don't want to waste all of my time creating 1000 redirects to these. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 21:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done! :) −ebrahim^talk 16:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.