User talk:86.130.4.25

Three strikes and you are out, buddy. The next vandalism goes directly to WP:AIV and will result in a block. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not your buddy, guy. WP:AGF 86.130.4.25 (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Golden hamster

You are out of WP:ROPE already. The next revert without discussion will get you reported. Your options are come to the talk page to discuss the matter, or stay away. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.130.4.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not entirely certain why I've been blocked (CheckUser? Have you considered that perhaps it's because I'm on a communal IP?) - though I state I haven't done anything wrong. I've been attempting to make contributions and while I'm having a somewhat civil disagreement with certain editors I don't see the problem. What do you stand to gain from blocking me?

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. You'll need to address this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Uggh, I knew I recognised you. This is Zombiedude101z, evading their block yet again. --Yamla (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered that the original block 'reason' is no longer relevant? I've at least tried to contribute over the last year, in spite of certain people rolling back my edits (I refer to Neal Ellis) specifically - a full fucking page on the man's biography, correctly sourced, removed because of wikipoliticking) 86.130.4.25 (talk) 23:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know the drill. Go make your unblock request on your account. It won't be considered here, except to note that you've been evading your block yet again. --Yamla (talk) 23:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, if you've been so abusive that you lost access to the talk page of your account, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. I can't recall if you lost access to that, too. If you did, you have no option other than to go away. --Yamla (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How have I been abusive, though? I think it's a bit ridiculous being told to 'go away' when I've done little but try and make contributions where I can. My attitude has been shaped by the hostility I've received. And you never addressed my point, Yamla - Neall Ellis - you spitefully deleted a page of properly sourced/cited content and reverted it back to the barebones piece it was before. Or when Elmidae pointlessly reverted some amendments I made to The Boys as 'uncited/unsourced' when it references the plot itself, since I don't see any other article needing a source to mention plot events! Why? How do either of these benefit the fucking wiki? Because until I get justification for it or some recourse, I will /never/ stop. I'll keep coming back, to make edits and contributions, whether you like it or not. Because, believe it or not, I originally came back to wikipedia with open and honest intentions but your attitude (and yes, I am pointing the finger at you a little here) hasn't done much to encourage me to work with the process or even give a damn about your approval. WP:UTRS is a fucking mess, it's a one way system with no option to feed back a response and there is limited space to write down what I need to in order to make my case, properly. I forgot to mention - this all started on Zombiedude101 - remember, Yamla? When you unblocked me, then reblocked me when I tried to get that account unblocked after five years of absence (albeit with the occasional drop on in between) - and you shut me down, needlessly. I gave you a chance and you blew it, so with no faith in the process I made it my own way. If people won't work with me then they don't get a say. Maybe you should consider taking this to the arbitration committee to discuss my fate, because to be quite frank if anyone here is the definition of WP:BITE and WP:HOTHEADS it's you. 86.130.4.25 (talk) 07:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.130.4.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read above

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Well, I did as you asked. I "read above" that you admitted to block evasion. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:18:18 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.