User talk:808-Thug

Blocked indefinitely

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Lil Lez (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Further comments: refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lil Lez. PhilKnight (talk) 22:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

808-Thug (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a Sockpuppet of Lil Lez

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:Lil Lez. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

808-Thug (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Really, I not a Sockpuppet of Lil Lez

Decline reason:

really. You are. No need for any further proof than these two edits. --Jayron32 05:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image (File:T.I. - Dead and Gone.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:T.I. - Dead and Gone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mass speedy deletions

I am aware that you are indefinitely blocked, but I am reporting a list of pages created by you solely for the purposes of redirection, which are irrelevent and serve no purpose to Wikipedia, and are currently nominated for speedy deletion, in accordance with WP:CSD#G5, WP:CSD#G8, and possibly WP:CSD#R3. These redirect to each other, forming redirect chains which violates WP:REDIRECT, and the page that they eventually lead to (see next section) fails WP:NSONG. These include:

PopMusicBuff ^talk 19:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Be with You (Wilber Pan & Akon song)

The article Be with You (Wilber Pan & Akon song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All links here are currently being removed/redirected to appropriate page. This particular song fails WP:NSONG as it did not chart anywhere and there is no other relavent information about this single.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PopMusicBuff ^talk 19:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Schife for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Schife, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schife until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 06:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 12 Play: 4th Quarter for deletion

The article 12 Play: 4th Quarter is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Play: 4th Quarter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]