User talk:8.8.53.219

September 2024

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Nikki Fritz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear Ropaire,

I'm completely puzzled. I thought I wrote a meticulously cited, even keeled but basic biography of a woman who deserved recognition. I understand that IMDB is not considered "reliable." But I've tried to include other websites recognizing her. I feel like the rejection suffers from bias against her because of her profession.

Please tell me what I am missing as plainly and simply as possible.

-A Fan trying to bring recognition. 8.8.53.219 (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately some subjects don't have sufficient reliable sources about them and there isn't much you can do as an editor about that - it's up to authors, researchers, reliable media sources and such to provide them.

Any article rejections aren't based on bias though, they're based on notability and whether there is enough reliable sources to write accurately and factually. Articles on living people tend to have the strictest rules around sources and content, which although it does make it harder, it does protect the subject of the article from malicious information or vandalism, and Wikipedia from legal issues. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---