User talk:7a6f7261
December 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Non-fungible token have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Non-fungible token. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --
7a6f7261, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi 7a6f7261! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
January 2021
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Non-fungible token, you may be blocked from editing.
Hey there, I just wanted to let you know that your persistent edits & reverts on the Non-fungible token article appear to be promotional and non-encyclopedic according to multiple other editors. Repeatedly reverting other editors removal of your added content is disruptive and it would be better to take up the matter in the article's talk page at Talk:Non-fungible token. I'm more than happy to discuss whether or not Cryptomedia is notable/appropriate to include in the article over there.
Otherwise if you continue reverting and re-adding the material back, as a seemingly WP:Single-purpose account, you could run the risk of being blocked or banned for WP:Edit warring or other similar offenses.
As a new user you may not have been aware of certain policies on Wikipedia, I can share some relevant links if you'd like more info. HiddenLemon // talk 03:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Seems like you were in a bit of an edit war over at Non-fungible token yesterday. Thank you for starting the talk page discussion afterwards. I would just like to note that community norms suggest starting a talk page discussion right after an initial edit is made and it gets reverted, instead of after more cycles of edit made/edit reverted. Have a good one. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)