User talk:79.69.118.137
Your recent editing history at Julius Evola shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)79.69.118.137 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made a perfectly reasonable compromise edit and ian instantly changed it back and blocked me. I doubt he even read it. He's a joke of an editor.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Maybe you should have read the warning you were given above, if not the discussion on the talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Maybe you should stop injecting your politics into an encyclopedia 79.69.118.137 (talk) 15:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Do something about that forest in your eye before you go pointing out the mote in anyone else's. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Pot calling kettle black. 79.69.118.137 (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
79.69.118.137 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ian labelling me an 'Evola apologist' isn't a personal attack? Greyfell calling me a pseudointellectual and various other things on the Evola talkpage aren;t personal attacks? Go ban them as well. 79.69.118.137 (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 17:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |