User talk:777EVIL10

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi was changed by 777EVIL10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961355 on 2015-09-10T22:43:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ScholarM. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ahmed Raza Khan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ScholarM (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

777EVIL10, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi 777EVIL10!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BiKaz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Toddy1 (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:197.38.238.159. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —C.Fred (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]