User talk:76.93.169.54
Welcome to Wikipedia
[edit]- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- No original research – Wikipedia articles must not contain original research
- Reliable sources – changes to text need to be back up by reliable sources.
- Conflict of interest – do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia.
- Finally, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Paul H. (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Feb 23
[edit]Please read wp:spa wp:consensus and wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry but any honest review of that discussion will immediately notice the repeated replies attacking an argument I specifically said I was not making.
- When I say "I am not claiming that the story is true because the text says it is true" and the reply is "A character in a fictional movie saying "this is a true story", does not make the movie factual." and I respond to insist upon what I already said multiple times in previous comments, that is not me "attempting to force my point of view by the sheer volume of comments". That is the other user attempting to drown out my original comment with sheer volume of non-sequiturs. I should have only had to say that once, since it was repeatedly not read, I was required to say it repeatedly. 76.93.169.54 (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Was this intentional on your part? To reply to me saying "Of course this does not mean the story is true" with "The Flashman books claim to be real, they are fiction.", so that I would have to repeat the point that you apparently did not understand, so that you could then accuse me of bludgeoning? If so that is diabolical and I admire it in a strange way, but if not, I am ready to accept an apology and move on. 76.93.169.54 (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well that did seem to be what you were asking, why are we calling it an allegory when Plato did not say it was, based upon his claim that his character said it was real? What did you want us to change if not to add that a character in a book said the story was real? Slatersteven (talk) 09:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly that. The *interpretation* of the text is stated in absolute language without qualification, and the actual framing of the story in the text by the author is only mentioned much later on. I can only speak for myself but it misled me dramatically as to what Plato actually wrote. If you can read the article, and then read the text, and disagree, then by all means. 76.93.169.54 (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to know what Plato write you had best rad Palto, this is about the wider concept of Atlantis. And RS say it was allegorical.Slatersteven (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly that. The *interpretation* of the text is stated in absolute language without qualification, and the actual framing of the story in the text by the author is only mentioned much later on. I can only speak for myself but it misled me dramatically as to what Plato actually wrote. If you can read the article, and then read the text, and disagree, then by all means. 76.93.169.54 (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well that did seem to be what you were asking, why are we calling it an allegory when Plato did not say it was, based upon his claim that his character said it was real? What did you want us to change if not to add that a character in a book said the story was real? Slatersteven (talk) 09:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |