User talk:7543sgserg5hw544ygsgdfvs

Welcome!

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Hello, PrestigousChimp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 11:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

May 2020

Hi PrestigousChimp! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at White genocide conspiracy theory that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

And many other articles. Best to never use it. Doug Weller talk 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Looks like misrepresentation of sources at Roman Britain - block-worthy?

Here's an offer - you show how the sources backed "However, it is important to not overstate this 'diversity'. Over 95% of the population at any one time was 'indigenous', with migrants often only being temporary and in population centres, with historians criticising media-hype about diversity as a 'revisionist narrative to suit pro-migration arguments in the 21st century", name the historians and explain why they all said the same quote, and attribute the first part of your text at the article talk page, and I won't block you. If you can do that, I'll eat humble pie. If you can't, clearly block-worthy. Doug Weller talk 09:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 09:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)