User talk:747beats380

July 2022

Hello 747beats380. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Bigbasket, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:747beats380. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=747beats380|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 10:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bigbasket (July 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

scope_creep^Talk 10:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 747beats380! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep^Talk 10:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

747beats380 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel like I have not been given a valid reason for my block. This is a brand new account and my first ever account editing wiki. My cousin who used to stay with me showed me wiki edits and how I can help people and what articles I should start, and now he was blocked for some reason and I have also been received because of having the same IP. All my edits till now have been proper by just adding financial information compqany pages and I don't see what rules I have violated and more. 747beats380 (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe is called meat puppetry. We don't know who is sitting at the computer. Your cousin will need to get unblocked first. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

747beats380 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here But tell me the reason for my band? Have I promoted any company? Have I done any paid editing? None. All my edits have been based on the financials of a company helping people know how the company has been performing and I don't see how that's paid editing like some others have been saying 747beats380 (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. You've been given a reason for your block. WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.